Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Assunto principal
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38498772

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Pelvic floor disorders are common and burdensome. Data on the effect of induction of labor on pelvic floor disorders are sparse and results are mixed. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate whether elective labor induction in nulliparous women increases the risks of symptomatic urinary incontinence (UI), anal incontinence (AI), or pelvic organ prolapse (POP) 4 years after delivery. STUDY DESIGN: In this single-site follow-up study of "A Randomized Trial of Induction Versus Expectant Management" (ARRIVE) that randomized low-risk nulliparous women with a singleton fetus to elective induction of labor versus expectant management, we compared pelvic floor symptoms between groups at a median of 4 years (interquartile range, 3.5-5.3) after first delivery using validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Seventy hundred sixty-six of 1,042 (74%) original participants responded, and 647 participants (62%) were included in the analysis after exclusions. The overall prevalence rates of symptomatic moderate to severe UI, AI, and POP were 21%, 14%, and 8%, respectively. There were no significant differences in any of the outcomes between women randomized to induction of labor and those to expectant management, either in unadjusted or adjusted analyses. There were also no differences in secondary outcomes, including subtypes of UI or flatal versus stool incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-site study, we found no significant differences in any UI, AI, and POP symptoms between nulliparous women randomized to elective induction of labor and to expectant management; however, for the least frequent outcome (POP), meaningful differences cannot be ruled out.

2.
Int Urogynecol J ; 35(4): 925-928, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38459972

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Because complete urinary bladder eversion is rare, a medical dilemma exists on the optimal treatment approach. The most extensive cases of this disorder have required a laparotomy for definitive management. Our transvaginal approach in this case provides an additional surgical perspective, which could potentially guide clinical care for patients with this disorder. CASE: We cared for a 76-year-old multiparous, postmenopausal woman with transurethral bladder eversion following a Le Fort colpocleisis, who presented with vaginal pain, bleeding, and renal failure. We used a transvaginal surgical approach rather than laparotomy as a novel surgical approach for treatment of the bladder eversion, which resulted in improved symptoms and renal function. We describe our diagnostic and decision making approach used for the care of this unique patient. CONCLUSION: Transvaginal bladder neck closure and suprapubic catheter placement is an acceptable and less invasive alternative to the laparotomy with cystopexy for the surgical management of recurrent bladder eversion.


Assuntos
Vagina , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Vagina/cirurgia , Doenças da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...